The future of transportation has officially arrived, and it carries a Tesla badge. At a dazzling reveal inside Tesla’s Giga Texas facility, Elon Musk announced the company’s first-ever flying car, priced at just $6,789—a number so disruptive it sent shockwaves not just through the automotive world but also across international borders, particularly in China.

For years, Tesla fans and skeptics alike have speculated about Musk’s next big leap beyond electric vehicles, solar energy, and rockets.

Few expected the leap to be quite so literal. But on a stage lit with neon-blue beams and roaring applause, Musk confirmed what enthusiasts had whispered about for months: Tesla’s flying car is real, affordable, and already redefining what’s possible in mobility.

The Grand Reveal

The vehicle, temporarily dubbed the Tesla AirRoadster, descended dramatically from above the stage, suspended on magnetic lifts before settling to the ground in front of the audience. At first glance, it looked sleek but deceptively minimalistic—like a compact coupe with futuristic wings folded flush against its frame.

But as Musk tapped a key on his phone, the real magic unfolded. The wings extended outward, turbines hidden beneath its chassis whirred to life, and the AirRoadster lifted a few feet off the ground before hovering silently. The crowd erupted.

“Transportation has been two-dimensional for too long,” Musk declared. “We’ve conquered the road. Now it’s time to own the sky.”

A Price Tag That Stunned the World

While flying cars have long been the stuff of sci-fi films and billionaire prototypes, the $6,789 price tag left jaws on the floor. Analysts had expected Tesla’s entry to cost at least in the six-figure range. Musk, however, explained that Tesla’s breakthroughs in battery efficiency and lightweight materials allowed for radical cost savings.

The announcement didn’t just capture headlines in the US. Within minutes, Chinese state media outlets picked up the story, some even calling it “a direct challenge” to China’s dominance in electric mobility. Chinese social media exploded with posts of disbelief, some praising Musk’s innovation, others questioning whether the price could even be real.

One viral post on Weibo read: “We built trains to rival Tesla’s cars. But how do we compete with a car that flies?”

What’s Inside: The Futuristic Core

So, what makes the Tesla AirRoadster so revolutionary?

Quad-Turbine Lift System: Instead of bulky propellers, Tesla uses four micro-turbines embedded within aerodynamic housings. These are powered by a new solid-state battery pack that delivers immense energy without sacrificing weight.

NeuralFlight AI: The AirRoadster features Tesla’s most advanced autopilot yet—built not just for streets, but for skies. NeuralFlight uses AI to detect air traffic, weather patterns, and obstacles in real time, adjusting flight paths instantly.

Zero Noise Propulsion: Perhaps the most jaw-dropping feature was its near-silence. Unlike traditional drones or helicopters, the AirRoadster lifted with barely a hum, thanks to Tesla’s patented noise-canceling turbine tech.

Interior Beyond Imagination: The cabin feels less like a car and more like a personal spaceship. A panoramic glass dome covers the top, offering a 360-degree view of the sky. The dashboard has been replaced entirely with Tesla’s augmented-reality windshield, projecting maps, diagnostics, and even entertainment directly onto the glass.

Range and Speed: Musk confirmed the AirRoadster can travel up to 500 miles on a single charge, combining both ground driving and flight. In the air, it can cruise at speeds of up to 180 mph, making it faster than most private planes.

China’s Shock — and Skepticism

While American audiences marveled at the breakthrough, the biggest reactions came from abroad. China, home to the world’s largest electric vehicle market and Tesla’s fiercest competitors, was particularly vocal.

Industry experts in Beijing warned that if Tesla could truly mass-produce the AirRoadster at the advertised price, it could destabilize China’s EV industry. “This isn’t just an innovation—it’s a disruption,” wrote one analyst for China Daily.

Social media responses ranged from admiration to suspicion. Many Chinese netizens doubted the feasibility of such a low cost, calling it a “publicity stunt.” But others admitted that Musk’s track record—mocked rockets, criticized EVs, and solar roofs—often turned skepticism into global market revolutions.

Regulation and Reality

Of course, the announcement raises immediate questions about regulation. Air traffic control systems are not currently built to handle consumer flying cars, and Musk acknowledged that hurdles remain.

“We’re working with the FAA and international regulators,” he said. “It’s going to take time, but the technology is here. The world will catch up.”

Musk suggested Tesla is developing a “SkyGrid” system—an AI-managed network that could oversee thousands of flying cars in real time, preventing collisions and managing flight paths just as seamlessly as autopilot handles cars today.

Global Reactions

In Washington, D.C., lawmakers scrambled to comment, with some praising the innovation while others raised safety concerns. Senator Marco Rubio tweeted: “The future is here. But safety, security, and regulation must move as fast as innovation.”

In Europe, regulators were cautious, while fans flooded Tesla forums asking when pre-orders would open.

In Silicon Valley, rivals reportedly held emergency meetings. A source inside Apple’s long-secretive car division told reporters: “If this is real, Apple Car is already obsolete.”

The Crowd’s Reaction

Back at Giga Texas, the audience could hardly contain their awe. Attendees described the reveal as feeling like “watching the first moon landing” and “the birth of a new era.” Many left the event in disbelief that a flying Tesla could cost less than some iPhones.

One Tesla fan summed it up best: “Elon Musk just made the impossible not only possible—but affordable.”

What Comes Next

Musk confirmed that limited production will begin in late 2026, with deliveries expected in early 2027. Priority will go to safety testers, government regulators, and then Tesla’s earliest pre-order customers.

He also hinted at a network of “Skyports” Tesla plans to build in major US cities, where AirRoadsters can land, recharge, and take off again—effectively creating the first infrastructure for airborne commuting.

A Turning Point in History

If successful, the Tesla AirRoadster could do more than revolutionize commuting. It could reshape cities, economies, and even geopolitics. No longer confined to roads, people could live farther from cities, reducing housing crises. Nations could rethink transportation infrastructure. And companies worldwide will be forced to chase Tesla’s lead—again.

“This isn’t just a car,” Musk concluded. “It’s freedom.”

And in a stadium still buzzing with disbelief, the audience seemed to know they were witnessing history—one that left China shocked, the world astonished, and the future forever changed.

Social media reports suggest a $6,789 Tesla flying car with advanced AI and eco-friendly tech was announced at Giga Texas, allegedly shocking China with its low price and 2026 launch. However, this appears to be speculative, with official focus remaining on the Roadster and other EVs.

Details of the Alleged Announcement:

• Price and Features: The vehicle is rumored to cost $6,789, utilizing existing EV parts for low production costs. Key features reportedly include advanced AI, eco-friendly power, and impressive flight capabilities.
• Production: Rumors indicate prototype production has begun at Giga Texas, with a potential release as early as 2026.
• Impact: The purported low cost is designed to disrupt the industry, with reports claiming it has shocked Chinese competitors.

Context and Verification:

• Official Position: Elon Musk has primarily discussed a “SpaceX package” for the next-generation Tesla Roadster, which might include thrusters for short bursts of hovering, but not a full flying car.
• Misinformation: Some viral posts about this topic have falsely attributed images of other companies’ vehicles (such as Jetson or Klein Vision) to Tesla.
• Market Reality: Actual personal electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft typically cost significantly more, often exceeding $100,000 to $1 million.

Therefore, while the social media hype suggests a major breakthrough, there is no official confirmation of a $6,789 Tesla flying car.

Elon Musk Reveals 5 Shocking Secrets Inside the $6,789 Tesla Flying Car FINALLY Coming Soon!! (With Tesla Flying Car Shocking Secrets Audio Overview & Quiz)

• Post author:SunflowerStella
• Post published:November 3, 2025
• Post category:AI / AI IN TRANSPORTATION / Flying car / Innovation / Recent Content / Technology
• Post comments:0 Comments

Spread the love

Audio Player

00:00

00:00

Use Up/Down Arrow keys to increase or decrease volume.

Elon Musk Reveals 5 Shocking Secrets Inside the $6,789 Tesla Flying Car FINALLY Coming Soon!!

I. The Vertical Leap: Musk’s Promise and the Future That Never Came

In the Nutshell: The Unforgettable Demo

The flying car is the quintessential symbol of the future, perpetually just beyond our grasp—but what if that future cost less than a used sedan?

For nearly a century, the promise of the flying car has been the quintessential symbol of the future, perpetually just beyond our grasp. The concept dominates vintage futurist sketches and science fiction, representing the ultimate freedom from mundane terrestrial congestion. Today, as specialized electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft near commercial service, the long-held fantasy of personal flight is finally colliding with the harsh realities of physics and airspace regulation.

The sector, already defined by dedicated aviation startups, received a massive, unexpected injection of spectacle when the CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk, suddenly teased the automotive world with a new ambition: a prototype of a flying car, built under the Tesla banner.

The scene was set in a late-night podcast discussion, where the host, Joe Rogan, inquired about the long-delayed second-generation Tesla Roadster. The electric sports car, initially slated for production in 2020, has been pushed back repeatedly, leading to public friction—notably from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who claimed difficulty retrieving his $50,000 deposit placed back in 2018.

Instead of addressing the vehicle’s seven-and-a-half years of delays, Musk successfully executed a narrative pivot of spectacular proportion. He promised that Tesla was “getting close to demonstrating the prototype,” claiming that this product demo would be “unforgettable.” The prototype, he suggested, contains “crazy, crazy technology.” He invoked a common lament from his friend, Peter Thiel, that the promised future of flying cars never arrived, stating that if Peter wants a flying car, Tesla should build one. Musk teased that the demonstration could take place before the end of 2025, a timeframe he suggested for the new Roadster’s unveiling.

The genius of this move was immediate: by grafting the ultimate futuristic concept onto the stalled Roadster program, the conversation instantly shifted from accountability for production delays to anticipation for a world-first revolution. The focus on the company’s past shortcomings was replaced entirely by a shiny, highly ambitious new narrative, resetting the public’s patience by promising a substantially higher-value, world-changing product.

The $6,789 Price Paradox: The ‘Shocking Secrets’ of Affordability

A highly speculative, yet widely circulated, claim accompanying the flying car rumors centers on an astounding projected price point of just $6,789. This price, which is less than one-sixth the cost of a Tesla Model 3, stands in stark contrast to the hundreds of thousands of dollars competitors charge for their prototypes. Musk has insisted that rivals may copy Tesla’s ideas, but achieving that low price point would take them decades. This cost breakthrough is reportedly enabled by Tesla’s advanced, cost-effective manufacturing methods. Key among these “shocking secrets” is the 50,000-ton Giga Press utilized at Giga Texas for chassis production. Tesla engineers reportedly plan to integrate these massive presses into the production line for the first generation of the flying car, leveraging extreme scale and efficiency to dramatically undercut the traditional aerospace industry.

Key Media: Watching the Sky Race

For those tracking the latest developments and the original commentary, the following links provide essential context on the announcement and the competing market dynamics.

Key Media: Tracking Tesla’s Flight
Newslink: https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/elon-musk-teases-tesla-flying-car-crazy-technology
Podcast Link:((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxREm3s1scA))
Video Link:((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_B8j5O9Xck&vl=en-US))

The Strategy of Spectacle

While the promise of an aerial vehicle generated immense excitement, the context necessitates a degree of skepticism. The announcement arrived amidst a flurry of external regulatory scrutiny and internal production challenges. Musk has a long track record of setting “overly optimistic and ambitious timelines,” visible in the years-long delays of projects like the aforementioned Roadster and the SpaceX Falcon Heavy.

The commitment to delivering an “unforgettable” demo suggests that the primary value of the unveiling lies in publicity and spectacle. For a vehicle concept facing severe technical and regulatory hurdles, prioritizing a grand demonstration is often a strategic move intended to maximize investor and consumer sentiment, offsetting potential technical shortcomings or regulatory unpreparedness that could delay an actual product launch for years.

II. Physics and Feasibility: Separating Hypersonic Hype from Aerodynamic Reality

Moving past the spectacle, any proposed flying car must adhere to the immutable laws of aerodynamics and electrical engineering. The fundamental technical obstacles facing a road-legal car attempting to achieve vertical flight are immense, centered primarily on weight, drag, and power delivery.

The Thruster or the Fan? The Mechanism of Lift

Tesla’s concept must overcome the engineering challenge of lift without turning a high-performance sports car into an inefficient aircraft.

The earliest iteration of this airborne concept, teased back in 2018, involved a “SpaceX package” for the Roadster. This package was proposed to use “cold-air thrusters—actual rocket tech—to boost performance, improve handling, and maybe even ‘hover’ for short bursts.” This description suggests that the original intent was not sustained cross-city flight, but rather performance enhancement and limited hover capability, perhaps for momentary ground clearance or cornering assistance.

A more recent technical hint appeared in a Tesla patent for a “fan-car-like system” that would utilize fans to manage airflow, potentially creating a powerful vacuum beneath the car. This system suggests an aerodynamic assist mechanism rather than a full Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) rotor array, which would require significant structural changes. If the prototype relies on powerful thrusters or vacuum suction for only short, dramatic hops, it dramatically reduces the technical complexity and, crucially, the rigorous certification burden associated with full, sustained powered-lift flight. This technical path strongly supports the theory that the demonstration will showcase a “hover car” rather than a true eVTOL, which helps rationalize the optimistic timeline.

The Energy Barrier: Why Flying Batteries are Different

The most crucial technical barrier for any electric flying vehicle is the battery. Electric cars, such as those made by Tesla, require high energy density to achieve long driving range. In contrast, eVTOL aircraft demand not only high energy density but also extremely high power density simultaneously. High power is essential for the instantaneous and sustained thrust required during the demanding take-off and landing phases. For practical eVTOL operation, battery densities of at least 200 Wh/kg are generally recommended.

Tesla’s much-heralded 4680 cell design represents a major achievement in EV manufacturing, optimized primarily for cost reduction—with a goal of making battery packs cost $100 per kilowatt-hour or less—and improved energy efficiency via its larger size and tabless structure. This focus on manufacturing scale and cost-effectiveness allows for improved heat and electrical conduction over traditional designs.

However, the current consensus among battery experts suggests that the existing 4680 cell design “still isn’t enough to make the 4680 a feasible choice for eVTOLs.” The cell lacks the specific power density required for the instantaneous, immense power surges needed for vertical lift. If Tesla had achieved a simultaneous breakthrough in both cost and the required extreme power density for sustained flight, it would have fundamentally upended the entire aerospace battery industry, not just its own car lineup. The current optimization of the 4680 cell for energy density and cost strongly implies that the flight capability demonstrated will be severely limited in duration, range, and operational intensity, lending further credence to the “short hover” concept rather than a fully functional air taxi.

Musk’s Paradox: Tunnels vs. The Sky

The flying car project introduces a curious contradiction to the CEO’s previous stance on urban mobility. For years, Musk has championed the tunneling solution offered by The Boring Company as the superior method for solving traffic congestion. He explicitly argued against flying cars, stating that people would object to “the anxiety of having large machines fly over their heads.” The purported benefits of tunnels—unlimited layers, weatherproof operation, silence, and non-division of communities—were presented as key advantages over air mobility.

This pivot to actively promoting a flying vehicle is remarkable. Furthermore, The Boring Company has faced scrutiny regarding its own regulatory compliance, having been accused of violating regulations and incurring proposed fines, raising questions about whether a new Tesla air project will navigate the complex regulatory environment of aviation with the necessary rigor. The transition from dismissing flying cars to creating one represents a significant philosophical shift, or perhaps a realization that the air mobility market is simply too large and too appealing to ignore.

III. The Flight Path to Commercialization: Regulatory Checkpoints

Even if the engineering challenges are resolved, the true complexity of air mobility lies in satisfying the stringent safety and operational requirements mandated by aviation regulators. Certification is often the longest, most expensive, and most unpredictable variable in the path to market.

The FAA’s New Category: Powered-Lift

Electric flying vehicles are fundamentally different from both traditional helicopters and fixed-wing airplanes. Recognizing this, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) established a specialized regulatory category called “powered-lift” to address this new hybrid class of aircraft.

These new rules were necessitated by the unique challenges presented by eVTOLs, including the need for specialized training for pilots who must operate aircraft possessing both helicopter and airplane characteristics. The Powered-Lift rules permit operations across various use cases, including private use, fractional ownership, commuter/on-demand air tours, allowing these aircraft to fly anywhere conventional aircraft are permitted, subject to their specific capabilities and pilot qualifications.

The MOSAIC Pathway: Personal Flight

For a company like Tesla, facing a tight self-imposed deadline for a prototype demonstration, the path to full commercial Type Certification, which can take a decade, is highly impractical. However, there is a potential regulatory shortcut that could apply to a high-end personal vehicle like the Roadster concept.

The FAA’s recent Modernization of Special Airworthiness Certificates (MOSAIC) rules are designed to integrate smaller, less complex aircraft more easily. This framework will allow certain eVTOLs, particularly those designed as two-seaters, to be certified as Light-Sport Aircraft (LSA). Crucially, achieving LSA status drastically lowers the barrier to entry for pilots. These aircraft can be flown by individuals holding a sport-pilot certificate, a qualification that is significantly less demanding to obtain than a full commercial pilot license. For example, the Skyfly Axe, a two-seat personal eVTOL, is targeting this LSA certification pathway.

This regulatory avenue provides the most plausible and fastest route for Tesla to bring a flying vehicle concept to limited market availability. Given that the Roadster is a high-performance, limited-edition luxury item, positioning the airborne version in the personal recreational or LSA category would allow Tesla to meet its timelines and claim a world-first, without having to undergo the rigorous, multi-year operational certification required for scalable air taxi services, such as those being pursued by its competitors.

IV. The Quiet Competition: Why Joby and Archer Are Already Flying

While Tesla generates global headlines with a promising teaser, dedicated eVTOL developers have quietly spent years overcoming the engineering and regulatory hurdles, placing them on the verge of commercial operation. The true race is not for a memorable prototype unveil, but for certification and scalable operational integration.

From Concept to Conforming Prototype

Leading pure-play eVTOL companies have moved past the conceptual stage and are now flying conforming prototypes integrated into the existing airspace infrastructure. These milestones represent not just technological capability, but regulatory maturity.

Joby Aviation, which currently commands the largest market capitalization among dedicated eVTOL companies, has demonstrated significant operational achievements. The company completed its first piloted air taxi flight between two public airports in California. Their S4 aircraft has proven its capability to perform a critical maneuver: transitioning seamlessly from vertical takeoff and landing mode to efficient, sustained wingborne flight. Joby is in the final stages of FAA certification, actively building six conforming aircraft for Type Inspection Authorization (TIA) flight testing, which is expected to begin around the end of 2025 or early 2026.

Archer Aviation has similarly validated its performance, successfully flying its Midnight eVTOL on a long-range test that covered 55 miles at speeds exceeding 126 mph. Archer is regularly expanding its speed, endurance, and mission profiles, demonstrating that its program is maturing beyond simple demonstration hops and into real-world operational testing.

These achievements underscore a crucial difference: Joby and Archer are demonstrating operational integration—flying in noise-sensitive areas and between existing airport networks. This heavy lifting in infrastructure and air traffic management is essential for scalable commercial service and is a level of commitment not reflected in Tesla’s focus on a single, unforgettable prototype demonstration.

Market Reality: The Race for Air Taxi Dominance

The market has already defined its leaders based on maturity, regulatory progress, and capital investment. This confidence is reflected in the valuations of publicly traded eVTOL manufacturers.

Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY) currently stands as the clear leader among pure-play air mobility companies, holding a market capitalization of $15.4 billion. This figure far surpasses that of its nearest publicly traded rival, Archer Aviation (NYSE:ACHR), which is valued at $7.2 billion. This market confidence reflects Joby’s aggressive strategy as a vertically integrated operator, combining aircraft design with ride-sharing platform planning and vertiport management.

Joby is not merely testing; it is finalizing commercial launch plans. The company plans to carry its first passengers in Dubai starting in 2026, with initial operations in the U.S. focused on key metropolitan areas like Los Angeles and New York City.

Despite the focus on major players, the overall industry structure remains highly competitive. The top four developers (Joby, Archer, Lilium, and Vertical Aerospace) collectively control less than 30% of global firm orders. This decentralized market structure emphasizes that while early mover advantage is critical, technological specialization and infrastructure partnerships will define long-term success.

The table below contrasts the progress of the established leaders, which are approaching market entry, with the status of the highly anticipated Tesla concept.

eVTOL Market Leaders: Progress vs. Tesla Concept

Company (Ticker)	Vehicle Status	Certification/Launch Target	Key Operational Milestone	Market Cap (Approx.)
Joby Aviation (JOBY)	Conforming Prototype, Piloted Flight	FAA Certification 2026, Dubai Service 2026/2027	Full transition to wingborne flight demonstrated.	$15.4 Billion
Archer Aviation (ACHR)	Piloted Flight, Long-Range Testing	Targeting FAA TIA Flight Testing (Near-Term)	55-mile flight at 126 mph demonstrated.	$7.2 Billion
Tesla (TSLA)	Prototype Teased (Roadster-linked concept)	Demo promised End of 2025	Demonstration of “crazy technology,” possibly hover/lift.	N/A (Focus on Automotive)

V. Forecasting the Future: What Success Looks Like for Tesla

The true significance of the Tesla prototype demonstration—should it occur on schedule—will be measured by its functional performance, not just the fanfare.

The Demo Day Stakes: Hover vs. Flight

For the aviation community, the critical distinction on demo day will be whether the prototype achieves true, sustained vertical flight (eVTOL) or simply utilizes performance-enhancing technologies for a spectacular, short-duration hover. Given the analysis of the current limitations in the 4680 battery cells—specifically the lack of sufficient power density required for sustained vertical lift—the technology constraints strongly suggest that the “crazy, crazy technology” will be a derivative of the thruster or fan systems.

If the vehicle uses short-burst thrusters for limited hovering, it will be accurately described as an augmented car, a halo product meant to push the boundaries of automotive performance, but not a direct competitor to the purpose-built air taxis like Joby’s S4 or Archer’s Midnight. While spectacular, this would not be a revolution in aviation.

The path from a working prototype to scalable, affordable production remains the greatest challenge. Tesla has historically struggled with rapid scaling of new, complex products, as seen in the long delays of the Cybertruck and the Roadster itself. Unless the demonstration reveals a true breakthrough in battery chemistry or packaging that resolves the fundamental power density bottleneck, the aerial Roadster will likely remain a very high-end, limited-edition item for high-net-worth enthusiasts, utilizing the LSA regulatory path for niche market entry.

Disruptor or Distraction?

Tesla’s entry into the air mobility conversation, regardless of the vehicle’s eventual flight performance, yields two immediate effects.

First, it provides massive market validation. The involvement of a major tech brand and one of the world’s most visible CEOs immediately validates the entire Urban Air Mobility sector, pushing air travel firmly onto the public radar. This attention ultimately benefits established pioneers like Joby and Archer by legitimizing their efforts and drawing broader investor and regulatory focus.

Second, the true disruptive potential of Tesla is not necessarily the flight mechanism itself, but its commitment to cost reduction. There have been highly speculative, if improbable, claims that Tesla could eventually produce a flying car for an astoundingly low price point, such as $6,789, dramatically undercutting current certified eVTOLs, which often cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. While this specific price point is likely hyperbole, it emphasizes Tesla’s reliance on its advanced manufacturing processes, such as the 50,000-ton Giga Press for chassis production. If Tesla can successfully transfer its philosophy of cost-efficient, high-volume production (using breakthroughs like the 4680 cost model) to aerospace components, that economic leverage could fundamentally reshape the industry’s supply chain, a disruption far more significant than the initial demonstration flight.

VI. The Flight Test: eVTOL Knowledge Quiz

Test your comprehension of the new frontier of air mobility, regulatory hurdles, and competitive market dynamics discussed in this analysis.

Question 1 (Definition): What does the “eVTOL” acronym stand for, reflecting the propulsion and flight characteristics of this new class of aircraft?

Question 2 (Technology): What is the critical battery performance metric where current Tesla 4680 battery cells face limitations, making them potentially insufficient for the high instantaneous demands of vertical takeoff and landing?

Question 3 (Competition): Which U.S. eVTOL company currently holds the highest market capitalization among dedicated air mobility pure-plays, and is preparing for commercial service in Dubai and major US cities?

Question 4 (Regulation): What is the new FAA rule framework that could allow certain two-seat eVTOLs to be certified as Light-Sport Aircraft, enabling them to be flown by holders of a sport-pilot certificate?

Question 5 (History/Musk): Prior to teasing a flying car, what alternative high-speed urban transit solution did Elon Musk famously promote as superior to airborne vehicles, due to concerns about public anxiety and noise?

VII. Answers to the Flight Test

Answer 1: Electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing.

Answer 2: High Power Density. The high power density required for immediate, sustained vertical thrust is the chemical hurdle that current 4680 cells, optimized for energy density and cost, struggle to clear.

Answer 3: Joby Aviation (NYSE:JOBY).

Answer 4: MOSAIC (Modernization of Special Airworthiness Certificates).

Answer 5: Tunnels, designed and built by The Boring Company.